C:T Forums
Site Search

 

New Members
  Chathambomb (16/5)
  vscomp (16/5)
  trevorzaichik (15/5)
  whitedevil (14/5)
  balalou (14/5)

   » Full C:T Members List

Other Resources
News Archive






Matthew Schellhorn Interview

Posted on Saturday, May 26, 2007. © Copyright 2004-2008 David Bruce
A longer version of this interview is available to CompositionToday Full Members.
Click here to learn more about becoming a member.

C:T talks to Matthew Schellhorn, one of the rising stars of the new generation of UK pianists

Matthew Schellhorn
Tell us something about your background.

Originally, I'm from Yorkshire, where I was born in 1977.

At thirteen, I went to study at Chetham's School of Music in Manchester, where I learned with a wonderful piano teacher, David Hartigan; during that time I also took lessons with Ryszard Bakst and Maria Curcio. They were all extremely different teachers, yet the variety of approaches I experienced from a young age was so helpful, and still is. I'd say what my early teachers had in common was a deep respect and love for music, and I could feel that from them. In addition to the insights they shared with me, they also made me realise the need to work hard, and the need to look with fresh eyes at music no matter how familiar it is.

After school I went to study music at Cambridge, and while there I began to study with Peter Hill, whose recordings I had got to know at school. I had started to play Messiaen's music when he died (in 1992), and as I played more and more Messiaen it seemed natural and only right that I should ask for Peter's advice on my playing. I was also looking for a teacher that could respect the fact that I was by now an adult! What developed took me completely by surprise: we got on so well that we became good friends, which created an ideal environment for learning. I couldn't but respect the beauty of Peter's music making, not to mention the experience he brought to lessons having studied with Messiaen himself; but we also studied so much more - lots of Chopin, Bach, Mozart, Berg - and we talked a lot about music.

Later on, more recently, I went to study in Paris with Messiaen's wife, Yvonne Loriod (whom I had first met when I was seventeen). These lessons were extremely moving experiences, where we would play for long periods, chat about Messiaen's life, and also about life in general. Madame Loriod's sheer humanity and kindness remains a huge inspiration to me.


How did you become interested in Contemporary Music?

I have always been interested in contemporary music; I don't think I can remember why or how it happened. I think I have always been open to playing any music.

When I play an 'established' piece I try to approach it as if it had just been written, so that I can try to experience how fresh it must have sounded when it was itself new.

You have a special relationship with Messiaen's music. What is it that attracts you about his music?

Messiaen's music has a bit of everything that great music has! Rhythmic vitality; harmonic colour; subtlety and suppleness of expression. The Catholic spirituality in Messiaen interests me greatly, as does his fascination with the natural world. There is also great virtuosity, which of course I enjoy! The first piece of Messiaen I played was, I think, Île de feu No. 1 from the Quatre études de rythme.

What excites you about a piece of music - what keeps you interested?

I like music that seems uncontrived. And it needs to be emotionally direct. I also like a piece to have a strong formal sense, which is not to say that it needs to be structured in an obvious way. One of my favourite pieces of new music is Ian Wilson's Lim, the form of which is discernible almost only when viewed, as it were, from a distance: it proceeds like a stream of consciousness when you're playing or listening to it, though. I'm also very fond of James MacMillan's piano miniatures: everything that is on the page is 'necessary'. Speaking technically, I like a certain amount of lyricism and rhythmic dynamism. I think you can 'feel' when a piece is written well: it validates itself.

And what turns you off ?

Complexity that seems to be for its own sake.

What do you see as the role (intended and actual) of new music in the modern world?

Yes, I guess there is indeed a difference between 'intended' and 'actual' insofar as new music is concerned in the modern world. But maybe it's as simple as this: new music is like old music, and its role is as an expression of the human condition.



A longer version of this interview is available to CompositionToday Full Members.
Click here to learn more about becoming a member.


Interview by David Bruce © Copyright 2004-2008

Comments by other Members


To post comments you need to become a member. If you are already a member, please log in .